the beating of Rodney King
In 1991, a man named Jonathan Kozol wrote a book called Savage Inequalities. After traveling to schools across the country for two years, Kozol became frustrated with the inequalities and disparities he saw in public schools in the United States. While many schools flourished with abundance, others, often only across town, struggled with overcrowding, decrepit buildings, poor sanitation, and a shortage of teachers and textbooks. In his travels, Kozol found time and again that the schools that were struggling were in poor, urban communities and the well-off schools were found in mostly White, middle to upper class communities. He argued that through these blatant disparities racial segregation was still alive and well.
Racial segregation is a form of institutional racism, one that many believe is a mistake of the past, long done away with. But racism through institutional establishments is very much alive, and can be easily found in the savage inequalities of the public education system.
Jonathan Kozol
The establishment of public education was a great milestone for the United States. The idea was one of American tradition. A public education system meant equal opportunity and the freedom for all American children to be given a fighting chance in the world. The public education system is supposed to be the ultimate equalizer. Instead, it sets a trend for a life of inequalities and sends the strong message to our children that equality is a falsehood. Children in the most desperate need of opportunity are told that while we may all be created equal, we are not treated equal.
In 2005, Kozol wrote The Shame of the Nation. He had hoped that after nearly fifteen years things would have improved. Instead, he found that things were just as bad, if not worse.
"One of the most disheartening experiences for those who grew up in the years Martin Luther King and Thurgood Marshall were alive is to visit public schools today that bear their names...and to find how many of these schools are bastions of contemporary segregation." -Kozol, 2005
Also in 2005, the Education Trust published a report concerning the funding of schools in the United States, using calculations based on the U.S. Department of Education's school district revenue data. The report was called "The Funding Gap 2005," and it concluded that there is blatant inequalities in funding per child between communities within the same state. They found that less money was spent on children from areas with high concentrations of poor and minority families and that more money was spent on children from White, affluent communities.
inner-city Chicago
Suburbia
"In other words, we take children who have less to begin with and give them less in school too. In the nation as a whole, we spend approximately $900 less per year on each student in the school districts with the most poor students than we do in the school districts with the fewest poor students, a gap effectively unchanged over the six years that the Education Trust has examined state and local funding for education." - The Funding Gap 2005
In some states the disparities are frightening. In 2003, Illinois spent $2,065 more per child from the lowest poverty districts than children in the highest poverty districts, and spent $1,154 more per child from low minority districts than children from high minority districts.
And while a $900 national funding gap per child may seem small, that number adds up when talking in terms of classrooms and entire schools. The state of New York spends $2,419 more per child in predominantly White districts than in minority-high districts, and $2,930 more per child in the highest-income district than the lowest-income district. In a classroom of 25, that's a difference of $57,000. That means that a classroom in the poorest school district of New York is given $57,000 less per year than a school in the district with the wealthiest families. Between two elementary schools with only 400 students that's a funding gap of $912,000. Between two typical high schools of 1,500 students that's a difference of $3,420,000.
"The U.S. public school system is still rigged in favor of students from richer, Whiter districts...the United States remains the only major developed country in the world that exhibits this shameful pattern of educational inequity." -Michael Rebell, executive director of the Campaign for Fiscal Equity
The cause of the funding problem is where the money is coming from. Local governments provide an average of 48% of the budget, with the state contributing about 45%, leaving the federal government with the remaining 7%. Funding for education comes from property taxes. People pay a percentage of property tax based on their property's worth, and of course those who do not own property don't pay property tax. So naturally districts with more valuable property and wealthy property owners have more money to spend. The richer the kids' parents, the richer their schools, and the poorer the kids' parents, the poorer their schools. It is a system designed so that the rich get richer and the poor get poorer.
Other countries, like Canada and Japan, had the foresight to stop this problem and fund schools entirely from federal funds. Federal funding is the only way to guarantee that each child is the given the same amount of money for their education, and thus the same chance at success through education. The quality of a child's education should not depend on where that child lives or how much money that child's parents make.
According to the 2000 Program for International Students Assessment, the United States ranks 15th in Reading Literacy worldwide, 14th in Science worldwide, and 19th in Math, trailing behind Korea, the Czech Republic, and Liechtenstein (yes, that's a country).
From this we can each draw our own conclusions.
On September 3, 2008 over 1,000 Chicago public school students skipped the first day of school to protest unequal funding in the public education system. Said one student,"It's on us kids. If we don't, we'll be on the bottom."
My Story
I graduated from Central High School in Harrison, Tennessee in 2005. My mother taught there and coached cheerleading when I was a child. I remembered the school being a typical high school, with the vast majority of the students being White. Soon after my mother moved to a new school, the city opened a large landfill in the area where I lived and went to school. My family and I moved soon after, and the property values of Harrison and the Highway 58 area of Chattanooga plummeted.
After my parents divorce, my mother moved back to Harrison, and my sister and I ended up going to Central High. But it wasn't the school I remembered. The year before I started the county decided to integrate a predominantly Black school, Tyner Academy, with Central, a predominantly White school. Racial tension and self-segregation were more than apparent, but what was also apparent was the deteriorating state of the building and the falling reputation the school once prided itself on. There were those who blamed the arrival of the Black students, and then there were those who knew better.
I grew up in Harrison, and I have traveled up and down the highway that runs through it thousands of times. When I was a child the area was mostly White and middle class. Since then property values have fallen drastically and the area is now home to a large number of minorities, mostly Black. Not surprisingly, I heard plenty of White people complain about the changes happening and conveniently blamed everything on our new Black neighbors. The truth was their complaints would have better served their children had they gone to the source of the problem, our School Board, who no longer cared about Central High School.
Central High's biggest rival was Ooltewah High, a school not far away. Luckily for them, big, suburban developments began springing up everywhere around the school, and with them came White people with some money. Despite annual county-wide budget cuts, Ooltewah managed to renovate their school and build new, state of the art buildings, including a new gym that looked like a fancy movie theatre. Their school band was lucky enough to travel and even had their own tour buses.
Meanwhile, at Central, the smells of sewage from failing pipes filled our school on a daily basis. Windows and brick walls outside would be crushed by trespassers and wouldn't be fixed for a year. The gym had poor ventilation and no air conditioning. The heat and air almost never worked inside. Trailers lined the back of the school, a cheap and quick fix for overcrowding. On rainy days, we suffered from leaks so bad we had to abandon some classrooms. It was commonplace to be hit on the head by a piece of ceiling falling from above. Never would you find a government building, like a courthouse, capitol building, or city hall in the state our school building was in. Every year we send our children to schools in deplorable and hazardous conditions, in structures that look more like abandoned buildings than schools.
The worst part was that we knew that they didn't really care about us. I might be White, but the school I went to was not. I saw first-hand how students from a school with large numbers of kids from low-income, minority families were treated by the very people who were supposed to be protecting them and giving them the opportunities they were promised. We weren't ignorant. We knew that we were the unwanted stepchild of the School Board. Right before our eyes they shortchanged us and gave what we needed and deserved to a school that already had so much.
I was frustrated and angry, like many of my peers. Even after years had passed since I graduated, I still resented the injustices I witnessed. It should be said that, despite all of this, we were blessed with teachers who made certain that we received the best education they could give us, and we did.
In my junior year of college I was blessed again with the opportunity to produce my own activist documentary. Inspired to expose the injustices of the local public education system, I made a twelve minute documentary called "Disturbing Inequalities," the title being a reference to Savage Inequalities. I made a piece of work that I was proud of and that allowed me to take the injustices that I and so many others had suffered and make them known. I hope to continue to raise awareness about this issue, and, more than anything, I hope to see these savage and disturbing inequalities put to an end.
